Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Calvinism vs. Arminianism!

Okay, so we are all on the same team! But!!! Opinion may differ and that's cool too!
This post is not complete, I'm hoping to update it as life goes on!!
My personal view, is that there is a mysterious truth blended with both these views, how we can put it together, I don't know, and don't think anyone does! Whenever you identify too strongly with one position, you must dismiss some scriptures! (that's my opinion, waiting to be convince otherwise!)

Calvinism


T - Total Depravity
  • Rom. 6:20
  • Gen 8:21
U - Unconditional Election
  • Eph 1
  • Rom 9

L - Limited Atonnement
  • Mark 10:45
I - Irresistible Grace
  • John 6:37
P - Perseverance of the Saints
  • Phil. 1:6

Arminism

Conditional election
Mat 11:28-30

Unlimited/Full Attonement
1 John 2:2

Resistable Grace
No scripture!

Running away of the saints

Freewill - responsability to respond:
Acts 2:38

Prevenient Grace
John 16:18
Luke 24:45


Monday, December 16, 2013

Bibliology - How did we get the Bible?

Verses 

Mat 4:4 But he answered, “It is written, ‘Man does not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.’"
Luke 24:44-47 Then he said to them, “These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the law of Moses and the prophets and the psalms must be fulfilled.” 45Then he opened their minds so they could understand the scriptures, 46and said to them, “Thus it stands written that the Christ would suffer and would rise from the dead on the third day, 47and repentance for the forgiveness of sins would be proclaimed in his name to all nations, beginning from Jerusalem.

Process

Revelation

Thoughts in the mind of God, which he reveals to men so they become thoughts in the Mind of Men.

Inspiration 

God  guides men to write down what he reveals to them in a way, mysteriously using the human element but allowing making sure that all of scripture are his words.
The product of inspiration are the original autographs!

For them to be spread they were copied. Leading to many manuscripts being formed. Along with copies of the original texts, we have many different manuscripts of other writings which are circulating. 
Result: lots of manuscripts. Some copies of the original other of non-inspired texts. 

Canonization

There are many many manuscripts!
The Process of Canonization is the process of recognition of the inspired texts. They are then then preserved through copies. 

Textual Criticism

Process of reproducing the original manuscripts.
By comparing all the manuscripts. 

Translation

The critical text is converted into modern languages. For people to understand.

What can't stop there!

Interpretation

Believers with the help of illumination of the Holy Spirit understand what the scriptures mean. 

Application

Believers do what the Bible says!
This leads to spiritual growth. 

Communication

One of the applications is that they communicate the gospel to the whole world!

Sunday, December 8, 2013

Micah 6:8

Just spent the biggest part of last week writting a 10 page paper on the book of Micah!

To give everyone a bit of Backgroung.


  • THE BIBLE
    • First 5 Books
      • Beginning of Everything, Specially beginning of Israel
      • Giving of the Law
    • Joshua - 2 Kings
      • Tells about the story of Israel, pretty much about how they keep trying to do their own thing (sinning!)
      • God sent them many prophets to remind them to repent! ts
    • Prophets
      • 3 main ones (Isaiah, Ezekiel, Jeremiah) 
      • 12 minor prophets
        • 6 who focus on sin (including MICAH)
        • 3 judgment
        • 3 restoration.
Micah is the Last Book to focus on sin, so we really get the feeling as we read it that judgment is just around the corner!
The Book has 3 cycles of prophecy: 1-2; 3-5; 4-7 - They all talk about the judgment to come, the sin they have committed, and each mention some of the hope they should have for the future.

What stuck me the most as I was studying the Book was this long dialogue, God is having with the people in Chapter 6:
He's reminding them of the Good things he's done for them like taking them out of Egypt..
Israel asks what then? Will A few burn offerings satisfy you, to make you happy?
This is when God answers:


Mic 6:8 He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?

1. To do Justice
2. to love kindness
3. walk humbly with your God. 

Justice, as in not injustice. Probably meaning you treat everyone around you fairly. Don't seek just your own joy, if it means others might miss out.
Give to people what is due to them. 
Look at your society, see if some people are being oppressed in anyway? This is a big theme in the book.

Love kindness: We all love different things, TV, Movies, Nature, Nature, Food, ... God is telling us to Value Kindness. What would that look in all our lives? It would probably mean spending less time of everyday valuing other things, no?

Walk humbly with your God - I guess there's no going around it here, if you claim God does not exist, if he does, well you two are not Cool! This echo's Hebrews 11:6 which says to approach God you must believe that he exists! The second thing is understanding the concept of humility? False humility, is when we always try to put ourselves down when we do not mean it, true humility is to be confident in the right thing! When walking with God, placing your confidence in the right thing, means rellying on God rather than on your own strength. This one covers a lot!


Let's see how we can do good in God's eyes, by practicing justice, loving kindness, and walking humbly with him, 

Love love love, 

Julian



Saturday, November 30, 2013

Inerrancy/Authority of the Bible



The plenary and verbal inspiration of the Bible, has two implications: the Bible possesses God’s authority, and it is inerrant.[1] After explaining Biblical authority, we will study why the Bible is inerrant, the importance of this doctrine, how to understand it correctly given apparent discrepancies in scripture and different existing views of inerrancy.

Authority is the right to command belief or action.[2] Being the Supreme Being, and the source of all truth, God possesses authority inherently. Because all scripture is God-breathed (2 Tim.3:16), it is the authentic embodiment of God’s self-disclosure, possessing his authority.[3]

Many reasons lead us to believe the Bible is inerrant. God cannot lie (Tit.1:2), therefore, his inspired words are without error (Ps.12:6).[4] Prevailing against the attacks of modern science, the accuracy of the Bible has only become more evident.[5] Inerrancy is an essential doctrine. Theologically, if God is omniscient and omnipotent, he is able to produce a Bible without errors. Being good, he does not lead us into error. Historically, this is normally the first doctrine to fall, before heading for liberalism. Epistemologically, if the Bible is not true or only partly true, how can we know anything?[6]

Though we hold the inerrancy of scripture, many discrepancies can be found. For example the parallel accounts in the Gospels do not always seem to concur. Some theologians ignore the discrepancies, others, abandon the doctrine of inerrancy, while others try to explain and harmonize everything. According to Erickson, we can harmonize when it is sensible, try to explain what we can, and admit we don't have all the answers, while maintaining the inerrancy of the Bible.[7]

The inerrancy of the Bible has been viewed in different ways. Those holding the absolute inerrancy of scripture believe the Bible can be used for science and history as well as religion. Given 2 Chronicles 4:2, it seems weak. Another extreme is to limit the inerrancy of the Bible to matters of faith and practice alone, meaning the Bible can contain mistakes on other matters. Who then choses what is true and was is not? There is a middle view: full inerrancy. The Bible, when interpreted in light of the culture, the means of communication, the time and its purposes, is fully truthful in all that it affirms. It should not be taken as a history or science text book, but what it says about those topics are true, knowing that things are reported as they appear, and approximations are be given.[8] The Bible’s main purpose is to place humanity in a right position to God. Scripture is not limited to religion, it teaches about everything – humanity, the world, nature, history, their origin and their destination. From this point of view the scripture is authoritative[9]

Inspiring the writings of manuscripts, God has produced the Biblical text which is inerrant. The Bible commands obedience of belief and practice. The Doctrine of full inerrancy is essential to the Christian faith. It affirms the Bible is true in everything that it communicates for its intended purpose.




[1] Howard Marshall, Biblical Inspiration, 1st ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans I. Publishing Company, 1982), 51.


[2] Walter A. Elwell, ed., Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2001), 153.


[3] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI.: Baker Academic, 1998), 270-1.


[4] Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology: an Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1994), 90.


[5] Josh McDowell, The New Evidence That Demands a Verdict (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1999), 61.


[6] Erickson, Christian Theology, 251-3.


[7] Erickson, Christian Theology, 256-7.


[8] Erickson, Christian Theology, 248.


[9] Donald K. McKim, ed., The Authoritative Word: Essays On the Nature of Scripture (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1983), 185-6.

Canon of Scripture



The existence of inspired Scriptures demands to be recognized and collected to make up the Canon, which gives a standard for Christian living.[1] Studying what the Bible and tradition says about authoritative writings, we will see how the canon was constituted, and why it is now closed, and God’s revelation is complete.

The Canon began when God wrote the Ten Commandments (Ex.31:18). Being placed in the Ark of the Covenant (Deut.10:5), they had to be considered authoritative.[2] The book of law written by Moses (Deut. 31:24-26) was then added, followed by Joshua’s writings (Josh.24:26). Prophets like Samuel (1Sam.10:25), Isaiah (2Chr.26:22), and Jeremiah (Jer.30:2) also later wrote adding God’s words to the canon.[3] The New Testament witnesses about itself. Paul claimed to speak the words of God (1Cor.14:37) and Jesus promised the Holy Spirit would remind his disciples of all truth (John 16:13-14).[4] The Apostle’s writings found themselves on the same level as the Old Testament (2Pet.3:16).[5]

The canonicity of the Old Testament books depended on nothing other than being determined by God. According to Edward J. Young a book is canonical if it is inspired, and therefore written by a prophet (Heb.1:1).[6] Though the Apocrypha has been viewed as canonical by some[7], it claims not to be prophetic (1Macc.4:45-46). This belief is also found in Jewish literature such as Josephus’ writings.[8] We believe as Jerome when he included them in the Vulgate, their value is in helping understand history and tradition.[9]

The church is built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets (Eph.2:20). Authority to write New Testament Scripture came with the Apostolic Office (Acts 2:42), but given also to some close to the Apostles who could give apostolic teaching. Jesus promised that we would recognize what is from him and what is not (John 10:27)[10], so apart from the apostolicity, for books to be part of the canon, they had to be accepted as being part of the rule of faith, not contradicting other canonical books, and having wide acceptance as canonical in scattered congregations.[11]

The list of 27 books we have in the New Testament was established no later than A.D 367, and progressively affirmed everywhere. God has spoken to us through His Son (Heb.1:2). As we possess everything we need to know about Jesus’ life, death and resurrection, and the meaning for the lives of believers for all times we do not expect anything else. The Bible began with creation, and ends in Revelation with new creation. Its warning not to add anything to the prophecy (Rev.22:18) can also be applied to the whole Bible. Knowing God knows the importance of his word for those he loves, (Deut 32:47; Mat 4:4), we can claim to have God’s full revelation in the Bible.[12]

After inspiring scripture, God guided his people to recognize his words. Through scripture, and history we can see how the Bible came together, and understand why books were included while others rejected. Given God’s providence, we can be confident that the Bible today is complete, and we lack nothing for the life of faith.


[1] Rene Pache, The Inspiration and Authority of Scripture (Chicago, IL.: Moody Press, 1979), 161.
[2] Norman L. Geisler and William E. Nix, A General Introduction to the Bible, Rev. and expanded. ed. (Chicago: Moody Publishers, 1986), 204.
[3] Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology: an Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1994), 55.
[4] Grudem, Systematic Theology: an Introduction to Biblical Doctrine, 60.
[5] Pache, The Inspiration and Authority of Scripture, 174.
[6] Geisler and Nix, A General Introduction to the Bible, 211-212.
[7] Ralph Earle, How We Got Our Bible, (Kansas City: Beacon Hill Press, 2010), 35.
[8] Robert L. Saucy, The Bible: Breathed from God, ed. Bruce L. Shelley (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1978), 98.
[9] Grudem, Systematic Theology: an Introduction to Biblical Doctrine, 57.
[10] Pache, The Inspiration and Authority of Scripture, 160,176.
[11] Saucy, The Bible: Breathed from God, 93-4.
[12] Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology, 64-5.

Inspiration of the Bible



Having made the effort to reveal himself, logically God would facilitate the transmission of his revelation.[1] Inspiration is the process through which God works through man to produce a written record of his words.[2] Starting with the Bible’s claim on its inspiration, we will study what this means, explain the importance of this doctrine, and why it is reasonable given the evidence.

“The Bible is inspired because it says so” is a circular argument, but referring to itself is the only way of being consistent for this claim.[3] Proving nothing, this claim still demands to be taken it seriously. Its inspiration is assumed through scripture, and throughout Church History.[4] 2 Timothy 3:16-17 and 2 Peter 1:19-20 teach that God through his Holy Spirit, moved men to speak his words producing all of scripture through inspiration.[5]

Given these two passages, Christians cannot deny the inspiration of the Bible, however due to different definitions of ‘inspiration’, there are different theories to how it might apply. Believers find themselves in a spectrum from believing ‘inspiration’ meant the authors were just influenced by God, to believing God had taken over the writer’s body to produce the scriptures.[6] Others discuss the extent and intensity of the inspiration, asking whether every passage is inspired, and whether it applies to specific words as well.[7] To be faithful to the Bible and avoid a slippery slope leading to full liberalism, we must hold that mysteriously working through human free will,[8] God produced the original manuscripts of scripture, by inspiration which is plenary, referring to “all scripture” and verbal, meaning every word is from God.[9]

The Doctrine of inspiration is essential to Evangelicals, for all other doctrines depend on it. Denying it, how could we know anything? This Doctrine allows us to come to the Bible in confidence for correct information in order to worship God in spirit and in truth.[10] Inspiration is essential for the Bible, but we will see that it is also reasonable given the evidence.

If it was not for its inspiration how else would we explain its uniqueness? Apart from Jesus, the incarnate Son, believing the authority of scripture,[11] we are talking about 66 Books, written by over 40 authors, on three continents, with different social statuses, during 1500 years, in three languages, together forming one message. It is filled with prophecies that have been fulfilled, possessing the power to change lives, explaining why it is the most printed, most translated book to date. With all these facts, it is hard to deny the inspiration of the Bible.[12]

God has led men to record his revelations that they might be passed on. This is God’s inspiration. Many amazing facts about the Bible testify to its inspiration, and though opinions differ, we must hold that inspiration is Verbal and Plenary, essential to know God through the Bible to Worship him in Spirit and in Truth.



[1] James Orr, Revelation and Inspiration (London: Duckworth & Co., 1919), 155
[2] Norman L. Geisler and William E. Nix, A General Introduction to the Bible, Rev. and expanded. ed. (Chicago: Moody Publishers, 1986), 39.
[3] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology (Nashville, TN: Baker Pub Group, 1986), 200-201.
[4] Geisler and Nix, A General Introduction to the Bible, Rev. and expanded. ed., 99-111.
[5] Geisler and Nix, A General Introduction to the Bible, Rev. and expanded. ed., 36.
[6] Erickson, Christian Theology, 206-207.
[7] Erickson, Christian Theology, 210-213.
[8] Geisler and Nix, A General Introduction to the Bible, Rev. and expanded. ed., 47.
[9] Brian Edwards, Nothing but the Truth: an Explanation of the Inspiration and Authority of the Bible (Welwyn: Evangelical Press, 1978), 27-28.
[10] Walter A. Elwell, ed., Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Pub Group, 1996), 61.
[11] Elwell, ed., Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology, 60.
[12] Josh McDowell, The New Evidence That Demands a Verdict (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1999), 4-16.

How did the work and beliefs of John Hus contribute to the coming of the Reformation?



The reformation became inevitable when men illuminated by the Holy Spirit realized the Church as described in the New Testament was nowhere to be seen, as the Church beginning as the body of Christ had become an excuse for power. The Reformation consisted of actions to denounce the corruption and abuse in the Church including: “papal abuse, the false foundation of Papal authority, the ecclesiastical captivity of the Word of God, the superiority of the ‘religious life’, perverted priesthood and usurped mediation, and hierarchical captivity of the Church”.[1] John Hus was a forerunner of the reformation. Studying his life, thoughts and actions we will see what possible influence he may have had on the reformation.

The Babylonian Captivity at Avignon and the Great Schism of the papacy that lasted forty years revealed the corruption and abuse in the Catholic Church. Reforms were in order. John Wycliffe an Englishman, and John Hus, a Czech dared to stand up for their beliefs and demand the church would return to the teachings of the Bible for faith and practice.[2] As Wycliffe started putting in question the authority of the clergy, he was quickly condemned by the Pope in 1377. He argued against indulgences, absolutions, pilgrimages, the worship of images, the adoration of the saints and the treasury of their merits laid up at the reserve of the pope, and the distinction between venial and mortal sins. To him, compulsory confession was “the bondage of Antichrist”, the Antichrist being the Pope. He emphasized the teaching from scripture over any other source.[3] Wycliffe died when Hus was 15, but due to the influence he had on Hus’ work he deserved a mention.[4]

John Hus was born in a family of peasants in southern Bohemia. He studied theology at the University of Prague, before becoming a teacher.[5] A strong link between England and Bohemia was formed when Richard II of England married Anne of Bohemia. This relationship allowed many students from Bohemia to study in England. When some returned, they brought back with them Wycliffe's thoughts. In his student days, Hus became familiar with Wycliffe’s philosophical work. After his ordination, he came upon Wycliffe’s religious writing, and adopted the English reformer’s view of the church under the headship of Christ, rather than the pope, as its true head. [6]

As the preacher at Bethlehem Chapel, Hus used his position to circulate Wycliffe’s teachings. He commonly contrasted the pope’s behavior to Christ’s. The pope rode a horse; Christ walked barefoot. Jesus washed the disciples’ feet; the pope preferred to have his kissed.[7] His main attacks were targeting the Pope, the false hierarchical ecclesiastical system, and the doctrine of salvation by works prescribed by the Church.[8]

In his day resentment towards the clergy was spreading.[9] With his fiery sermons Hus gained widespread support among his fellow countrymen. Reports of Hus’ teachings made it to the Pope, which led to his excommunication by Zbynek, the Archbishop of Prague. Hus continued, attacking openly the Pope’s sales of indulgences to support his war against Naples. Prague fell under papal interdict, which led Hus to go into exile in southern Bohemia when he wrote his major work: On the Church. He was urged by Emperor Sigismund to appear at the Council of Constance. He thought he would have the chance to present his views, but he fell victim of the Inquisition. He was asked to renounce the errors or be burned.[10] The reward for confession was life imprisonment. Hus was accused of heresies that he had never taught. Denying the charges, and refusing to recant, he is burned alive on the 6th of July 1415.[11]

Following his death, Hus’ followers who were called Hussites continued in the engagement, confiscating Church property. One group, the Taborites rejected all in the faith and practice of the Roman Church that could not be found in scripture. Another, the Utraquists, only eliminated what the scripture forbade. Utraquists believed laity should be allowed to take both the bread and wine for mass. Because of the strength and influence of the Hussites, the Utraquists were granted their use of the cup, at the council of Bassel, though the group did not carry on for much longer. [12] The Taborites had a more significant influence, being at the origin of the Moravian Church in Germany. In this way we can say Hus had an influence on John Wesley, as the Moravians led Wesley to the light in London in 1738. Hus’ influence was not limited to this.[13]

Many of Hus’ thoughts were spoken still 100 years after his death during the reformation. These were the beliefs that every man, priest or layman, holds an equal place in the eyes of God. The most important thing, was the personal relation between a man and God. The mediating priesthood and the sacrificial masses of the medieval church are no longer essential, which destroyed the medieval barriers between the individual and God. Both Wycliffe and Hus anticipated Luther’s doctrine of justification by faith alone.[14]

There were two big parallels found between Hus and Luther’s lives. The same way Hus was asked to attend the Council of Constance, and promised safety, before being betrayed, in 1521, Charles V of Spain, invited Luther to the Diet of the Worms. Luther’s friends remembered what had happened to Hus, and warned Luther against it, but he went anyway. Once over there the same as Hus, Luther expressed his need of proof from the scripture in order to recant his views. [15]

In a period of abuse in the Church, Reforms are much need. With the influence of Wycliffe’s work, John Hus, means business, when he attacks the Pope and abuses in the Church. It eventually ends badly for him. But his work had great significance, as we still speak of this man born to a poor peasant family in southern Bohemia. It is hard to evaluate exactly how much influence he had on the Reformation, but his ideas were definitely in line with the thoughts of the reformations, returning to the scriptures for truth, denying the authority of the Pope, and Salvation through grace and Christ, not by works prescribed by the Church.















[1] Walter A. Elwell, ed., Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2001), 995-996.


[2] Bruce L. Shelley, Church History in Plain Language, Updated 2nd ed. (Dallas, TX: Word Pub., 1995), 223-225.


[3] Bruce L. Shelley, Church History in Plain Language, Updated 2nd ed. (Dallas, TX: Word Pub., 1995), 225-230.


[4] Andrew Miller, Miller's Church History: from the First to the Twentieth Century (London: Pickering & Inglis, 1976), 572.


[5] Robert A. Baker, A Summary of Christian History (Nashville, TN.: Broadman Press, 1959), 162.


[6] Earle E. Cairns, Christianity through the Centuries: a History of the Christian Church, 3rd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1996), 246.


[7] Shelley, Church History in Plain Language, 230-231.


[8] Miller, Miller's Church History, 577.


[9] Miller, Miller's Church History, 574.


[10] Baker, A Summary of Christian History, 162-3.


[11] Shelley, Church History in Plain Language, 230-2.


[12] Williston Walker. A History of the Christian Church.3rd Ed. (New York, NY.: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1970), 273.


[13] Cairns, Christianity through the Centuries, 247.


[14] Cairns, Christianity through the Centuries, 247.


[15] A.M. Harman, The Story of the Church, 3Rev ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Inter-Varsity Press, 2004), 111-112.

The role of the sacraments concerning salvation according to the Roman Catholic Church



The Catholic and Protestant Churches both agree, that salvation comes by grace through faith. [1] They believe salvation comes entirely from God, as He is salvation (Isaiah 12:2), and is the one who initiates faith, which is seen as a gift (Ephesians 2:8). Where these groups disagree is in how a man becomes justified through grace. The Catholic Church view as justification, the two-fold process the Protestant Church separates in justification and sanctification. In the first phase grace is freely given, in the second it is given through works. The Catholic Church’s liturgy is organized around seven sacraments that are supposed to touch all parts of the Christian life. Their purpose is to produce grace, and according to the Catechism, they are essential for salvation. [2] This paper will study each of these seven sacraments separately to examine how they are related to Salvation in the Catholic Church.


The first stage of justification begins with the sacrament of Baptism. According to the catholic encyclopedia, baptism “cleanses from original sin”, through this rite, an individual becomes a new creature.[3] Sharing in Christ’s death and resurrection,[4] one is reborn (John 3:3) and infused with justifying grace.[5] Because of the salvific powers of Baptism, parents are urged to baptize their children as quickly as possible. [6]


Once a baptized person has professed faith, and reached the age of reason, he is able to partake of a second sacrament called Confirmation. At Confirmation, the believer’s Baptism is ratified, thus his initiation to the Catholic Church is completed.[7] It is through this sacrament that one receives the Holy Spirit, in order to strengthen their faith and avoid temptation. The second phase of justification begins at confirmation, because it gives additional grace to what is received at Baptism, which cannot be infused prior to faith.[8]


The second phase of justification has begun, and from this point on, the following sacraments will all participate to earn more sanctified grace.[9] The third sacrament is the Eucharist. It has been declared to have primacy among the sacraments, for the nourishment of those who take part[10] and its importance in uniting and strengthening the church.[11] Through Christ’s re-sacrifice[12], those who have been baptized and confirmed can now participate with the community of faith in being nourished by Christ’s body and blood in the form of bread and wine.[13] The Eucharistic is offered for the sins of the living and the dead. Communicants receive forgiveness for “venial sins” and are preserved from “grave sins.”[14]


The following sacrament has a few names: penance, reconciliation, conversion, confession. Its purpose is to reconcile men to God. It is for the forgiveness of sins, including mortal sins committed after baptism. Confession is the first step to returning to God after sinning against him. Confession must be done, before being allowed to participate in the Eucharist.[15] The confession can be followed by the performance of an act of penance, suited for the offence, and then based on the passage in John 20:20-21, the minister forgives the penitent.[16] Through this process, the justification lost due to sin can be restored through a continuous process of confession and repentance. Because this sacrament forgives mortal sins, we see its importance for salvation.[17]


According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the covenant marriage has been raised to the status of sacrament by Christ. Marriage is designed for the union of a man and woman who unite to form a lifelong partnership. It is for the good of the spouses, procreation and their children’s education. The sacrament of matrimony infuses grace intended to “perfect the couple’s love and to strengthen their indissoluble unity. By this grace they help one another attain holiness.”[18]


The sacrament of Holy Orders is given to people, to serve “in the name and person of Christ in the midst of the community”, for the service of the faithful. There are three degrees of this sacrament, the first degree for deacons, then presbyters and bishops. It is given through the laying of hands, followed by a prayer of consecration asking God to grant the graces of the Holy Spirit required for this ministry.[19]


The final and seventh sacrament is the sacrament of the anointing of the sick. It finds its roots in James 5:14. The sacrament can only be performed by a priest, using oil blessed by the bishop. The sacrament is given to Catholics facing illness or who are close to death. The special grace infused by the anointing of the sick, gives strength to the sick person, courage to endure through suffering, and forgiveness for sins that were not obtained through the sacrament of penance. [20]


Having studied briefly all seven of the sacraments performed in the Catholic Church, we can conclude as they have, that to them sacraments are necessary for salvation.[21] Salvation is by grace through faith, but we have seen that it not so simple. The first step to become part of the catholic church, one must be baptized, to be cleansed by the original sin, and saved. Once a person confirms their baptism, they receive the Holy Spirit, and the process of sanctification begins. The believer receives more grace through the different sacraments. Communion is a way to get spiritual nourishment, penance to gain reconciliation and forgiveness for sins committed after baptism. This sacrament of reconciliation implies that there is no salvation without confession. Holy Matrimony, Holy Orders and the anointing of the sick all give extra grace to the one receiving the sacrament. For each sacrament the grace is proper to the sacrament and equips the believer for a particular situation. Catholics view salvation as a process, grace is first freely given, but in order to be saved, a believer must continually live a good life, which must include partaking of the sacraments, for the acquisition of more grace and forgiven for sins committed.


















[1] John Ankerberg & John Weldon, Protestants & Catholics: Do They Now Agree? (Eugene, OR.: Harvest House Pub, 1995), 40.


[2] U.S. Catholic Church, Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed. (Ligouri, MO: USCCB Publishing, 1995), 341, 319.


[3] U.S. Catholic Church, Catechism of the Catholic Church, 354.


[4] Robert C. Broderick, The Catholic Encyclopedia, Rev. and updated ed. (Nashville: T. Nelson, 1987), 65.


[5] Ankerberg & Weldon, Protestants & Catholics: Do They Now Agree?, 42.


[6] Carolyn Nystrom Mark A. Noll, Is the Reformation Over? an Evangelical Assessment of Contemporary Roman Catholicism (Grand Rapids, MI.: Baker Academic, 2005), 140.


[7] U.S. Catholic Church, Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed., 367, 359-60.


[8] Ankerberg & Weldon, Protestants & Catholics: Do They Now Agree?, 67.


[9] U.S. Catholic Church, Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed., 534-535.


[10] G.C Berkouwer, The Sacraments (Grand Rapids: MI.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1969), 29.


[11] Broderick, The Catholic Encyclopedia, Rev. and updated ed., 198.


[12] Ankerberg & Weldon, Protestants & Catholics: Do They Now Agree?, 67.


[13] Norman L. Geisler and Ralph E. MacKenzie, Roman Catholics and Evangelicals: Agreements and Differences (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 1995), 256.


[14] U.S. Catholic Church, Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed., 395.


[15] U.S. Catholic Church, Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed., 409-15, 395.


[16] Broderick, The Catholic Encyclopedia, Rev. and updated ed., 467.


[17] Ankerberg & Weldon, Protestants & Catholics: Do They Now Agree?, 67.


[18] U.S. Catholic Church, Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed., 446, 457.


[19] U.S. Catholic Church, Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed., 444-6.


[20] U.S. Catholic Church, Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed., 420, 425.


[21] U.S. Catholic Church, Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed., 319.

History of the formation of the New Testament canon.



If we claim the Bible is the Word of God, a question we must answer is: where did it come from? This paper will focus on the different stages of the formation of the New Testament. We will see how 27 writings, written by various authors, in different parts of the Mediterranean region over a period of 50 years came together to form the New Testament. We will study the formation of the New Testament in four stages: the recognition of some early Christian writings as authoritative, which led to the collection of these writings, developing into the idea of having a New Testament canon, which was finalized to give us the New Testament we have today.1

The canon refers to “a group of books acknowledged (…) as the rule of faith and practice”2. The idea of a canon is found right through scripture. We see Bible characters dealing with the writings of the Old Testament as God's Word. In Luke 24:44, Jesus refers clearly to the three groups of scripture we have in the Old Testament: “the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms.” This was the canon operating for Christians in the 1st century.3 Jesus' first come had changed things, specially how to interpret the scriptures. A lot of value was given by Christians to his words. As they recognized Him as Lord, they placed on him as much authority as they did to Yahweh in the Old Testament. Consequently great value was placed on the writings of the apostles which were reliable sources to get Jesus' spoken words.4


We find importance given to the New Testament scriptures in the writings of the Apostles, and then of the Apostolic Father. The first hints, of the value of the New Testament are found in its own writings. We see clearly in 2 Peter 3:16, Peter, one of Jesus' closest disciples is referring to Paul's letters, placing them on the same level as the Old Testament scriptures. From Colossians 4:16, we learn that Paul's letters could be passed on to other churches, again showing us they had influence and were given value.5 The Apostolic Fathers were also quoting and referring to the texts we now hold as being inspired. Clement of Rome, writing to the Corinthian church in 95AD, was quoting from both the Old Testament and the New Testament scriptures, these quotes were introduced with 'remember the words of the Lord Jesus'.6 Some argue that he may have just been using the oral tradition rather than the gospels7, but his reference to Paul's letters are a lot clearer, as he urges the church to refer itself to the Apostle's letters, and points to Romans, Galatians, Philippians and Ephesians.8 Similarly, references or quotes from New Testament books are found in the letters Ignatius wrote on the way to his martyrdom in 1109, and then seen in Polycarp's writings who makes a clear reference to Ephesians 4:2610, while writing to the Philippians Church also around 110 A.D.11 More evidence is found in the many other early Christian sources, showing the value given to the text we have in our New Testament, early on.


After the recognition of the New Testament writings, the second step to the formation of the canon is the collection of its writings. The quote mentioned previously from 2 Peter, shows Peter was familiar with many of Paul's letters: “as he does in all his letters”, he views them as a whole, and could imply that they had been collected. The writings of Clement, Ignatius, Polycarp, and the Gnostic Gospel of Truth, refer to many different passages from the gospels, or Paul's letters so we can also suspect that these writings were probably being collected.12 The collection of texts, was done by different people independently, did these collections differ? Did all agree upon which books were inspired?

Following the collection of 1st century litterature, they were given more and more authority, to match even the Old Testament scriptures, leading to the idea of a New Testament Canon. Marcion was the first to create a New Testament Canon. He had trouble accepting the God presented in the Old Testament, and believed the Christian message was being affected by Judaizers.13 He rejected the Old Testament altogether, and all the apostles apart from Paul, which led him to be excommunicated. This led him to create a new canon made out of the gospel of Luke, and ten of Paul's letters. Which then drove the church to examine the circulating Christian literature, to create its own canon. Marcion is not responsible for our New Testament but it seems he initiated the process. In reaction to Marcion unique gospel, the church put all four, after much debate. Marcion had only ten of Paul's letters, the church chose all 13.14 More books were added quite easily. With the recognition of Luke's gospel, the addition of the book of Acts came automatically. Irenaeus, bishop of Lyons, gave a lot of authority to John's Revelation, and to other general letters we find in our New Testament.15 On another front, the inspired texts were becoming more evident as they were being used by the apologists Anthenagoras and Theophilus of Antioch to defend the Christian faith against heretical views.


After the recognition of the New Testament writings as authoritative, their collection, and the sign of first canons, by the year 200, the core of the New Testament was evident. Disputes remained concerning the general Epistles to include, Hebrews and Revelation.16 In 1740 a librarian discovered the Muratorian Canon, which was named after him. This canon dates back to around 200 AD. Though it is not exactly what we have today, it gives a clear indication that writings were being examined for their authority, are sorted early on.17 Origen, later in the third century participated in the canonization process by sorting writings in three categories, depending on how authoritative they were. Then came Eusebius, who had is own view on which books were authoritative in the 4th century. It was only in 367 in a letter written by Bishop Athanasius of Alexandria that we find the 27 books that we have today.18 He was the first to use word “canon”.19 By the end of the 4th century the 27 books were accepted by the Latin church and by the Greeks, confirmed by the Synod of Hyppo Regious (396) and Carthage (397). At this time the Syrian church had 22 books in their canon. But 2 Peter, 2 and 3 John, Jude and Revelation slowly made their way to the canon by 508. These were kept by the reformers, and re-affirmed by the council of Trent (1545-63).20


Four steps are clear in the formation of the New Testament we have today. The first being the recognition of the New Testament writings by the early church, ending in their collection. These collections slowly became official, this process was finalized in the fourth century, when the New Testament we have today was recognized right through Christianity.



















1 A.B. Du Toit, Guide to the New Testament (Pretoria: N.G. Kerkboekhandel Transvaal, 1979), 185.


2 Walter A. Elwell, ed., Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2001), 155.


3 Eduard Lohse, The Formation of the New Testament (Nashville: Abingdon Pr, 1981), 18


4 Du Toit, Guide to the New Testament, 186.


5 Lohse, The Formation of the New Testament, 19.


6 Bruce M. Metzger, The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA, 1997), 41.


7 Du Toit, Guide to the New Testament, 189.


8 Metzger, The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance, 42.


9 Metzger, The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance, 45.


10 Du Toit, Guide to the New Testament, 193.


11 Metzger, The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance, 59.


12 Du Toit, Guide to the New Testament, 194-7.


13 Metzger, The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance, 93.


14 Du Toit, Guide to the New Testament, 208.


15 Du Toit, Guide to the New Testament, 210-11.


16 Lohse, The Formation of the New Testament, 23.


17 Lohse, The Formation of the New Testament, 21.


18 Lohse, The Formation of the New Testament, 23.


19 Du Toit, Guide to the New Testament, 83.





20 Lohse, The Formation of the New Testament, 25.

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Evil in this World and a loving God??!!

People from the Christian Faith, present God, as being good! One big reason people say they cannot believe in this God is that it is contradictory with all the evil that they see around them!

If God is good, and all powerful, how, and why would he allow evil to happen?

My opinion, is that most of what people call "evil" cannot actually be blamed on God. Either you want to be controlled, and be a robot; or you want to be free to do what you want. If it is freedom you want, then you are saying that you want God to give you as much potential to do good as to do bad! If you get this potential, then so does everyone else! Why then would you just blame him for the bad that you are responsible for yourself!? Most of the evil we want to blame on God, like famine, disease are actually man's fault. There is enough food in the world to feed everyone. So why don't we feed everyone? Is it not just our selfishness? Aids is often transmitted through doing stuff that the God of the Bible does not approve of, so you can specially not blame him for that!! Apparently most of cancer could be man made!
http://www.endalldisease.com/scientists-admit-cancer-is-man-made/
 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1320507/Cancer-purely-man-say-scientists-finding-trace-disease-Egyptian-mummies.html

Having said this, we are still left with earthquakes, thunderstorms, diseases... I can't blame man for everything!

So how to reconcile evil in the World with an all loving God? I believe that God allows evil to exist because He is awesome!

First thing I want to argue, is that if you believe in evil, then you must believe in God. If something is evil, it means that you feel that it ought to be different. As soon as you say it :"ought" you are saying there is a "proper" way things should be. You are bringing meaning to the universe. Either it is your imagination, or there really is a purpose, and organization,  intelligence in the Universe... God.


What the Bible teaches, is that all men have sinned, and deserve to die. 
Maybe you agree with that or maybe you don't. Whatever your view is, you must acknowledge that those who believe this must see evil being part of God's grace.

Let me explain: You and I deserve to die. But God sent his only Son to die, to pay the price for our sins in our place. Those who don't believe will die for their sin, because they are relying on themselves for salvation rather than on the God who saves.

What if all the evil seen in the world, was God pleading with you, agreeing with you, that this is NOT as it ought to be! "Come to me, and let me save you!". Satan is the one trying to get you to think that nothing is wrong with the world. Nothing is wrong with the way you behave. Satan gets you to believe that you are a good person. The Devil gets you to think that if heaven exists, then God would owe it to you, because you have not killed anyone and are a good person! Only an evil God would hide the consequences of sin from you. Only an evil God would not plead with you to repent from your evil ways. A god could chose not to want to be reconciled to all mankind, but this is not the God of the Bible.


Thus, I think Evil in this World and a loving God go perfectly together. When Christ returns all things will be made new. The renewal of the heavens and the earth will come with the destruction of death, pain, suffering, tears... This is what we wait for as Christians. If you believe in evil, then this is what you long for, as you've identified that the world is not as it should be!

My invitation, if you believe in evil, accept God's invitation repent, and become part of his children, who desire to manifests God in all they do, share the Good News about this Kingdom that is, and is coming, where this evil will be no more. Believe in the God who is good and all loving who would not deceive us by hiding our disastrous state and evil from us!

Gospel of Luke, Chapter 13:1-5
13 Now there were some present at that time who told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices. Jesus answered, “Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way? I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish. Or those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloamfell on them—do you think they were more guilty than all the others living in Jerusalem? I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish.”

Monday, September 2, 2013

Salt n Light (Mat 5:13-16)

Seeing the crowds, he went up on the mountain, and when he sat down, his disciples came to him.And he opened his mouth and taught them, saying:Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied.Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy.Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons1 of God.10 Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.11 Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. 12 Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you.13 You are the salt of the earth, but if salt has lost its taste, how shall its saltiness be restored? It is no longer good for anything except to be thrown out and trampled under people's feet.14 You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden.15 Nor do people light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a stand, and it gives light to all in the house. 16 In the same way, let your light shine before others, so that2 they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven.


Summary Beatitudes

The Beatitudes is a passage that describes what the people of the kingdom of Heaven look like today.
My believe is that the Kingdom of God is something later! It was the kingdom promised to Abraham, and then David, God promised that one in the line of David, would reign on his Throne forever! I believe that this kingdom we are waiting for is this one, that will be after Christ returns!
My view is that these people being described do manifest this future kingdom today, and receive some of the blessing prescribed to each attitude, but they will be fulfilled once Christ Returned.

The first attitude is toward ourself – poor in spirit
The second is towards our sins – mourn and Meekness, hunger thirst for righteousness
The Third is towards God – mercy, pure in heart, peacemakers
The fourth is towards the world – persecuted, salt and light.

Salt and Light

So the verses dealt with yesterday were v.13-15.
First the salt, if it's lost its saltiness it has no purpose at all!
Secondly the Light – It is what shines in darkness. Darkness does not really exist it is just lack of light! As soon as there is light in a room there is no more darkness. Darkness cannot put up a fight against light! When light comes, the darkness goes away there is nothing more to it. It is impossible for darkness to overcome light. Which is why I find this term for Christians so huge. We are the light of the world. No sin, no dark spiritual force could possibly stop us!

How are we the salt and the light? 

(based from a John Piper Sermon)

so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven.

This should be key for us to understand how to interpret what being the salt and light of the world means.

How can we live in a way, that other people might give glory to our Father who is in heaven when they see us?

Many people see good deeds and this does not cause them to give glory to our Father who is in heaven! So being salt and light is more than just doing good works! We must live in a way that reveals that we have more to live for than just the stuff we own. Our life must reflect our knowledge of something, hidden but greater that all that can be seen. Our hope is more than just this life, for we know Jesus and with him we have a treasure in heaven.

When we go back to the previous verses:

11 Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. 12 Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

Our hope allows us to rejoice in persecution. Our Joy leads to the overflow of good deeds that would not be expected of us under the circumstances we are in and leads others to glorify our father.

We saw on one hand that doing good works was not enough because they do not necessarily cause others to glorify God. Here we have the idea of rejoicing. But it is not on it's own. It is rejoicing while being persecuted. Who does not rejoice when he prospers?

We see that because of the hope we have in our heavenly reward, even when we are persecuted, we are still able to rejoice. This is the light that will trouble outsiders to the Christian Faith. It should shock the world! This light and salt is seen when we react in a completely different way than what is expected. When we love our enemies, bless those who persecuted us, when we learn to forgive the most horrible things done to us. When we live in such a way that forces people to ask the question – What is the reason for the hope that is in you?!? (1 Pet 3:15). When we don't complain, we don't grumble, we don't criticize, but appreciate everything as gifts from God. When we don't judge anyone, because we see them through God's eyes as precious children worth dying for.

Being salt and light is about the heart we have while we do those good actions, as we rejoice because of the things to come, our reward with Jesus. We are the salt in the light, when nothing seems to be going well, but we still realize Christ is enough to rejoice for!! We are light when people realize that God must be real to us, because of our perseverance, in difficult situations, a rough marriage, challenging job, inconvenient pregnancy, when anyone in their right mind would have given up a long time ago, filing for divorce, quitting the job, getting an abortion.


God is glorified in us, as we satisfy in Him, how much more glorified is he in us, when nothing would entails us to rejoice in anything, but yet, we still do in Him, before the world?

Saturday, August 31, 2013

The Prodigal Son - Luke 15




Last week I heard a really interesting take on the Prodigal Son!

- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWopbpBYSbc


Jesus told them this story: “A man had two sons. The younger son told his father, ‘I want my share of your estate now before you die.’ So his father agreed to divide his wealth between his sons.
“A few days later this younger son packed all his belongings and moved to a distant land, and there he wasted all his money in wild living. About the time his money ran out, a great famine swept over the land, and he began to starve. He persuaded a local farmer to hire him, and the man sent him into his fields to feed the pigs. The young man became so hungry that even the pods he was feeding the pigs looked good to him. But no one gave him anything.
“When he finally came to his senses, he said to himself, ‘At home even the hired servants have food enough to spare, and here I am dying of hunger! I will go home to my father and say, “Father, I have sinned against both heaven and you, and I am no longer worthy of being called your son. Please take me on as a hired servant.”’
“So he returned home to his father. And while he was still a long way off, his father saw him coming. Filled with love and compassion, he ran to his son, embraced him, and kissed him. His son said to him, ‘Father, I have sinned against both heaven and you, and I am no longer worthy of being called your son.’
“But his father said to the servants, ‘Quick! Bring the finest robe in the house and put it on him. Get a ring for his finger and sandals for his feet. And kill the calf we have been fattening. We must celebrate with a feast, for this son of mine was dead and has now returned to life. He was lost, but now he is found.’ So the party began.
“Meanwhile, the older son was in the fields working. When he returned home, he heard music and dancing in the house, and he asked one of the servants what was going on. ‘Your brother is back,’ he was told, ‘and your father has killed the fattened calf. We are celebrating because of his safe return.’
“The older brother was angry and wouldn’t go in. His father came out and begged him, but he replied, ‘All these years I’ve slaved for you and never once refused to do a single thing you told me to. And in all that time you never gave me even one young goat for a feast with my friends. Yet when this son of yours comes back after squandering your money on prostitutes, you celebrate by killing the fattened calf!’
“His father said to him, ‘Look, dear son, you have always stayed by me, and everything I have is yours. We had to celebrate this happy day. For your brother was dead and has come back to life! He was lost, but now he is found!’”

The Gospel is great, but what if it was even GREATER than what we thought.

So we always go on as we share the Gospel, that Christ died for the sins of mankind, that no matter what we've done, the Cross of Jesus is greater, to overcome all sins!

We must repent and be baptized (Acts 2:38).
God reveals himself to us, so that we can believe (Mat 11:27; John 6:44)
In chapter 15 in the Gospel of Luke, the first two verses are so important -
Now the tax collectors and sinners were all drawing near to hear him. 2 And the Pharisees and the scribes grumbled, saying, “This man receives sinners and eats with them.”
For this reason, Jesus tells them 3 parables - The Parable of the Lost Sheep, The Parable of the Lost Coin and the Parable of the Prodigal Son.

In all three Parables, Jesus is explaining to them why it is, that he eats with tax collectors and sinners, to respond to their grumbling. Jesus teaches them about the Father's love for everyone. How much worth he finds in everyone.

If I had 100 chocolate bars. If I lost one, it will not even be an issue, I probably wouldn't notice, and if I did, it really would not matter, because of the 99 I have left! God does not work that way with us. He cares so much about each one of us individually, to the point that there is great celebration at the end of each one of these parables - as the lost sheep is found, the lost coin is found, and the lost son returns home.

This is all straightforward - the new insight I got from the message, is that this is only the beginning of God's great love! The second son had who stayed home, while his brother was out spending all his father's money. When he hears about the party in honor of his brother's return, he blows up in anger! He represents the Pharisees who are grumbling about Jesus hanging with the sinners. This next verse is so key:
28 But he was angry and refused to go in. His father came out and entreated him,
Pharisees are the Proud religious jews who believe they have been made right with God through their good actions. This leads them to judge/condemn sinners. Jesus comes to rebuke them. Setting the standards so high that no one could ever be good enough to please the Father. As disciples of Christ, we must then be very careful not to play the Pharisee's game by judging them back!

The whole point of these three Parables was to show the Pharisees why he was after sinners. But this did not mean by any means that they were not to be part of the kingdom, and of the celebration. The pharisees are in sin! If they truly loved the sinners they would be celebrating that Jesus had come to make a way for them. But for this reason, they are like the lost sheep, the lost coin. No matter how much condemning and shaming they have done, we must be as Christ, agents of reconciliation, loving them, serving them, and leading them to God. In the Parable, the father came out to invite the angry son to join them in the celebrating, we must do the same, as we try to reflect the Father's love.

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Christian Hedonism



I want to be happy while I'm alive! I really do! And I think that we all do! While we are here why not make the best out of every opportunity!?

I believe in God, I believe he is good, and has created all things for his purposes. I believe we all admire things. I think God created us as worshipers! We look up to people, we adore good food, good music. We stand in awe when we see a beautiful sunset, or admire the mountains, and tropical beaches! In one way or another, we live differently according to our objects of worship, and YES, some worship computer games!

So, I believe that God created us as worshipers. I also believe God being God and all, is the most worthy object of our worship. He is behind everything we worship, he is the creator, he is the greatest, and nothing could ever be greater than he. The only way we can flourish is when we worship THE ONE who HE created us to worship... HIMSELF, rather than all the good things that are intended to point our worship to Him.

So this next part could be weird, but I think it makes sense! When people love themselves, it's a good thing, but it can get a obnoxious when people go on and on about themselves right?! But now if God is the only worthy object of our worship, what does that mean for him?! He must be obsessed with himself right?! And I want to say that if he wasn't all about himself, how could he expect us to be all about him?!?

Because he is all about himself, God just loves it when we worship him, when we appreciate him, when we delight in Him, when he is the one we depend on, when he is our all. Any replacement of Him in our lives is idolatry. When we replace God with something else, it upsets Him, because he is a jealous God, and also because he is a good God, he would not have created us with the purpose of worshiping anything lesser than himself. Worship anything other than God, is like Mountain biking with a road bike, it's really bumpy!

Hedonist= one who strives to maximize net pleasure. (wikipedia)


I want to claim that we are all hedonists, we all want to be happy, we want pleasure, and joy! But I believe most of us aren't hedonistic enough! The way to truly experience pleasure to the fullest is when we are in a relationship with the almighty God and strive to do his will. So maybe I've just lost you with the religious talk!

So here it goes! A few years ago, I went from being an atheist, not believing that there was any purpose in life at all (I didn't really have a problem with that, believed it was just the way things were!) to believing that everything on earth has a purpose. That God exists, that he is love, and he is in the process of reconciling all things to himself, through the death of Jesus Christ. This just changed my life in the best of ways. The Bible, God's word, is about God's love for mankind, and I see now, that it's not just a book of do's and don't's, but that God as a father looking out for his children's best interest warns against what is harmful to us, and recommends what is best for our well being. What is best for us, is to worship Him as Lord. Anything which leads us away from delighting in him is sin, anything that is in line with his plan allows us to flourish and he calls "good"! Because he is love, and loves us, he wants us to flourish. Because he loves himself, he wants us to love him! These both go together. The best thing is to love God, it causes us to flourish!

I love God! And it just happens that He loves that about me! He is glorified in me as I delight in Him. This joy I have, is the kind that makes me want everyone else to partake in. According to John Piper - Love is the overflow of Joy in God that gladly meets the needs of others. My joy, is based on the joy of others! How can I be truly joyful if others are not?

I want to be joyful! And I think you want that too! And I want to help you, because that will make me joyful too!

When we look at the world we must realize that something is not right! Just turn on the news, and read all the terrible things happening around the world! People aren't successfully finding joy. And what more they do not want anyone to find joy either. Since the fall of Mankind, when Adam sinned in the garden (Genesis 3), we are fallen creatures, we seek to serve ourselves. We are so short sighted, we look to alcohol, drugs, and sex for pleasures which do not last, but destroy us! We've given up on the only one who can satisfy. But right from the Beginning of Time, God has had a plan, to save humanity from its sin and deception. We all fall short of the glory of God, but He has sent his only son, to die in our place for our sins, so that we could be reconciled to Him. This is the greatest news ever. The only truth that can satisfy! Jesus Christ died, was buried and was raised from the dead. If you have better news than this, please let me know... I Want to know!! If it is not a truth that leads you to tell everyone then it can't be as good!!

It is in my best interest to share this with everyone because it will produce much joy for them, more joy for me and the best part of all, it is what I believe glorifies God the most!

Christian Hedonism is the best way to hedonism! As we were designed to find our joy in God! I don't see a finer way of glorifying God!

For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments. And his commandments are not burdensome. 1 John 5:3

This verse has often been on my mind. As I first started reading the Bible, I really started to understand that God is not about being a party poopper. Rather, he is our loving Father who wants the best for his children! He is the designer, so who better than Him, to help us live successfully in this world he engineered!? Who better than Him to give us a manual for life?! You can think that maybe God really appreciates "the sacrifices" you make for him everyday, and maybe you might even feel like he OWES you back? But is that really how you do relationships? "Hey Honey, because we are married, it is my duty to buy you flowers, so here you go..." Expect a big slap in the face! That is no relationship at all! Your spouse might prefer - "I love you so much, I could not help myself from getting these for you....'

I'm sure as we are, God is more interested in the second kind of relationship! Because he wants you loving Him, adoring him, delighting in Him! John Piper's definition of love - love is the overflow of joy in God which gladly meets the needs of others. Do you feel loved when someone does something for you out of pure duty?

I think the world would be a better place if everyone understood the beauty of glorifying God in delighting in him. Seeking what God wants for them, delight and joy for their life. If we were all filled with this overflowing joy that leads us to gladly meet the needs of others, then what could possibly go wrong in the world! Everyone wants to be happy, but as C.S Lewis says -

“It would seem that Our Lord finds our desires not too strong, but too weak. We are half-hearted creatures, fooling about with drink and sex and ambition when infinite joy is offered us, like an ignorant child who wants to go on making mud pies in a slum because he cannot imagine what is meant by the offer of a holiday at the sea. We are far too easily pleased.”

Here are a few verses about JOY from the Bible:

James 1:2 Count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of various kinds

Philippians 4:4 Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, Rejoice.

Galatians 5:22-23 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law.

Romans 15:13 May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, so that by the power of the Holy Spirit you may abound in hope.

1 Peter 1:8 Though you have not seen him, you love him. Though you do not now see him, you believe in him and rejoice with joy that is inexpressible and filled with glory,

Rom 14:17 For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking but of righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit.

John 16:22 So also you have sorrow now, but I will see you again, and your hearts will rejoice, and no one will take your joy from you.

Nehemiah 8:10 And do not be grieved, for the joy of the Lord is your strength.

John 15:11 These things I have spoken to you, that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be full.